If the good news we’ve been hearing about American health costs in the past few months turns out to be the new norm – it’s too early to tell – then much of today’s political debate is wildly misguided. Consultants predict 2014 will see abnormally low inflation, again. Medicare spending per beneficiary is dropping more than previously anticipated. And new tools provided by Obamacare to constrain costs could accelerate these trends.Read More
Tag Archives: Medicare
Their plan responds to a projected physician shortage. There’s heated debate about whether there will be a physician deficit in the future and, if so, how to best respond. There’s less debate about whether increasing the physician supply will increase our medical bills. It’s intuitive. More doctors will not only bill more so they can make an adequate living, but will order more tests and referrals. Normal economic logic that increased supply drives prices down doesn’t work in medicine.Read More »
Rich people have paid more for Medicare coverage since the program began in 1966. Subsequent changes have regularly increased the extra amount those with high incomes must pay for coverage. That history often seems totally forgotten in today’s Medicare reform debate about whether the program should be means-tested so as to require upper-income people to pay more.
In fact, that’s been a basic component of the program from the start, which makes the current debate so distracting and confusing. The real question is how much extra the rich should pay.Read More »
Many Americans have an unhelpful habit of viewing the health reform debate as a morality play where those who treat us, usually doctors and hospitals, are viewed as the good guys and those who pay for those services, generally insurance companies or government programs like Medicare, are seen as villains.
When a physician suggests another test, we assume that they’re trying to be helpful rather than merely increase their income. When an insurer refuses to pay for a test proven unreliable or has a less expensive alternative, we assume that the decision comes from heartless profit-maximizing bean counters.Read More »
House Speaker John Boehner recently confided in an interview that what astonished him most during his marathon negotiations with President Obama on avoiding the fiscal cliff was when Mr. Obama said to him, “We don’t have a spending problem.”
When I read that, I was reduced to sputtering indignation: “We don’t have a spending problem??!! What planet is that man living on??!!”
And yet, just a couple of days later, I read a column by Matt Steinglass in the January 8 issue of the Economist that made me realize that Mr. Obama was entirely right. We don’t have a spending problem; we have a tax problem.Read More »
The annual report of the Social Security trustees predicting when the various funds (retirement, Medicare and disability) will be depleted has become a meaningless rite of Spring that provides more heat than light. The news is always viewed as bad and ignored, a response that’s helpful only to those who have a vested interest in suggesting that our government is dysfunctional.Read More »
You can find me at the White House every day this week. Well, not personally, but my ears burn as I become the subject of a big conversation.
Shortly after World War II, I was a bump and reached age zero in summer of 1946. Run the math, and you’ll see I move into Medicare this summer.Read More »
If House Budget Chair Paul Ryan is interested in a real conversation about reforming Medicare with more light than heat, here’s a speech he could deliver that could make the conversation possible.Read More »