Quote of the Day:
May 21, 2013
“What we have been living for three decades is frontier capitalism, with the frontier constantly shifting location from crisis to crisis, moving on as soon as the law catches up.”
-Naomi Klein, Author, answering questions at a constituent lunch in Geneva, 9/18/2010
Our daily quotes are provided by American University's Simpson Fellows who continue the mission of Reverend James B. Simpson's Contemporary Quotations: The Most Notable Quotes From 1950 to the Present
Newsletter Sign-up
Sign up for our weekly newsletter and we'll send PunditWire updates right to your inbox.Sites We Read
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Christopher Buckley at The Daily Beast
- CNN Political Ticker
- Daily Kos
- Drudge Report
- Electoral Vote Predictor
- Ezra Klein at the Washington Post
- Firedoglake
- First Read
- FiveThirtyEight
- Frank Rich at New York Magazine
- Frum Forum
- Gallup
- History News Network
- Instapundit
- Maureen Dowd at The New York Times
- National Review
- National Review's The Corner
- Peggy Noonan at The Wall Street Journal
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Pollster.com
- PostPolitics
- Rasmussen
- RealClearPolitics
- Roll Call
- Salon
- Slate
- Swampland
- Talking Points Memo
- The Daily Beast
- The Daily Caller
- The Daily Dish by Andrew Sullivan
- The Daily Show
- The Economist
- The Hill
- The Huffington Post
- The Nation
- The New Republic
- The Weekly Standard
- Wonkette





Romney’s Momentum Un-Mitt-i-gated by Third Debate
Mr. Obama was supercilious, condescending and just plain rude to Mr. Romney. Within the first few minutes of the debate, he accused Mr. Romney of wanting to, “import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s.” If that were not enough, he later affected to explain aircraft carriers and submarines to his opponent: “We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.” He also attacked Mr. Romney’s visit to Israel as being nothing more than a campaign fundraiser.
But Mr. Obama’s calculated rudeness smacked of desperation. For this debate to affect the outcome of the election, Mr. Obama had to do more than show that he had more foreign policy experience than Mr. Romney. After all, everyone knew that from the beginning. He had to prove that Mr. Romney was incompetent to handle the nation’s foreign policy. And that he failed to do.
Mr. Romney kept his cool, showed that he had done his homework, and frequently pushed back aggressively.
So Mr. Obama overplayed his hand. He said that America is stronger now than when he took office, and that our alliances have never been stronger, “in Asia, in Europe, in Africa, with Israel where we have unprecedented military and intelligence cooperation, including dealing with the Iranian threat.”
With our embassies recently attacked in Libya, Egypt and Yemen, just how many people really believe that America is stronger today than four years ago? And with relations between Mr. Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu dripping with icicles, how many people really believe that U.S.-Israeli ties have never been stronger?
However many individual points Mr. Obama may have scored during the debate, he failed in his principal objective, which was to persuade the American people that they couldn’t trust Mr. Romney to conduct the nation’s foreign policy.
For that reason, it appears likely that Mr. Romney’s popular momentum will be un-Mitt-i-gated by last night’s exchange.